Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Saturday, June 1, 2019

Reason for the Season- Twilight Zone (2019)

    A couple years ago, I did a piece on this very blog lamenting that science fiction anthologies were not as common (relegated to season long anthologies at that time). In that piece, I mentioned that they shouldn't do another *Twilight Zone*, because there were at least two others before it. Well, they went and did it anyway, so that's why I decided to review it: to see if this lives up to any of the previous incarnations and to see how the anthology format holds up now. Just a reminder, these are more free-form, stream of consciousness than my typical reviews, and I include spoilers with abandon.  Also, I want to make this an official series, so there's a title. (Get it? Because TV series are organized into seasons and... you get it.)


    Okay, of the three version of this show, this is easily worst. I've said this for weeks as it has been released. For a long time, I regarded the 2002 version as the weakest one. Even that had some highlights and some good episodes (especially the sequel to "It's a Good Life," with Bill Mumy himself). This, however, has the weakest set of episodes so far. And it starts off fine. The Comedian episode with Kumail Nanjiani was pretty good, with a Twilight Zone-esque twist and very universal themes. It goes downhill from that almost immediately with the second episode, a very loose remake of Nightmare at 20,000 Feet called Nightmare at 30,000 Feet, which had... a podcast, I think, and Adam Scott running an airplane. Honestly, I don't remember a lot of it, and that's the problem with a lot of these. They don't really have those clincher moments that the standard Twilight Zone episodes do. Like, take the classic episode *Time Enough at Last*, of course about a dude who just wants to read, but is constantly distracted by the people in his life. At the very end, he has the time to read all the books he wants, since everyone else was wiped out by the apocalypse, but just he is about to, he breaks his glasses. That is a very iconic and very memorable moment. That is largely absent from this new incarnation, and in its place is... attempting to comment on modern social issues. Like, in the least subtle manner possible. The worst offender is "The Wunderkund", about John Cho as a political advisor who gets an 11-year old elected President. It is very clearly about Trump, and it is so painful to watch. Like, imagine all those hacky Trump jokes from like, Jimmy Kimmel and Bill Maher, and make them into a *Twilight Zone* episode and here's what we've got. "Not All Men" could've been interesting exploration of toxic masculinity, but doesn't really demonstrate that and has an ending that just contradicts itself. "Point of Origin" could've been as biting as an episode of the original, with a focus on the current immigration crisis. Again, though, it doesn't really explore these issues or really makes a point about them. It's just "yep. This is happening." People have defended (correctly) that the Twilight Zone from the 60's was political, but it always felt complete, and further more, held up as stories in their own right with universal themes. "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" could be held as a commentary on McCarthyism and the Red Scare, but could be seen as a simple story about mass hysteria and the dangers of paranoia. Hell, the 2002 one had an update that was pretty good, while also commenting on the hysteria following 9/11. A lot of these, beside being unsubtle, are just not really good or memorable. Okay, there is one, and it's the best one of this season "Replay". There is a strong undercurrent about police brutality and racism, but it never feels too attached to that. Instead, it has more of an overriding theme about changing the past and trying to build a future. That makes it work a lot better, since it combines contemporary themes with more universal ideals. Aside from that, it just isn't very memorable. I've heard "Six Degrees of Freedom," was touted as a highlight, but I didn't care for it, especially the end. I can't tell you anything that happens in "A Traveler" or "Blue Scorpion". The very last episode of the season "Blurryman" is also pretty mediocre for the most part, though its message about how people ought to explore and expand art in all different directions and explore new ideas and worlds, and that something can be both good art and good entertainment was decently handled in the closing narration (the episode leading up to it was decidedly less adept at this message). That narration reminded me a lot of how Rod Serling, a long suffering TV writer who had scripts regularly censored by sponsors for their too-close-for-comfort stories, was able to use SF/Fantasy to explore contemporary themes and new ideas. (They might've also taken influence from the old Tower of Terror ride in Disney California Adventure with their TZ homages) The thing with this is that it has potentially good ideas and has a stellar cast and crew. Thus, none of it is really bad per se, but at that point, it just doesn't reach the level of being good. It's solid mediocrity, and that's probably the worst part. It just doesn't evoke an emotion within you. I'll probably never see any of these episodes again, and I've rewatched plenty of the *Twilight Zone* from all its incarnations. It is revived for a second season, and hopefully, it does get a lot better, because I do see potential in this series, if they can look at what didn't work for people and fix it, this could be a great show. Finally, Jordan Peele does a decent job as narrator. I honestly preferred Forrest Whittaker during his short stint, or even the unseen narrator from the second season of 80's series. 

Well, with that out of the way, join me in a little bit as this year sees the next Summer of Terror with the Nightmare on Elm Street series.

Monday, March 18, 2019

Current Film Review- Long Shot

     I have two stories about this movie. One was that when I read about it a few months ago, it was called Flarsky (in reference to Seth Rogen's character). Long Shot is frankly a better title. Anyway, I watched this film after a class on Monday. I went to the bathroom in the other building, and saw they were having a free screening on campus in 13 minutes. Given I had nothing else to do, I went to watch it. What did I think?

       Fred Flarsky (Seth Rogen) is a journalist at an online outlet known for his progressive stances and aggressive demeanor. However, when right-wing mogul Parker Whembley (Andy Serkis) buys out his employer, Flarsky angrily quits. His pal Lance (O'Shea Jackson Jr. Ice-T's son, btw) decides to take him to a high class party where Boyz II Men are playing. Also at this party is US Secretary of State Charlotte Field (Charlize Theron), who is running for president on a specific environmental agenda. Flarsky has a particular connection to Field, as the latter was Flarsky's babysitter, and there was an awkward incident between the two (watch the film, I won't describe it). Field, against the advice of her staffer Maggie Millikin (June Diane Raphael) decides to hire Flarsky as a speechwriter for her campaign. So begins a gradual journey as the two navigate politics and romance.

      The thing that most stood out to me was the chemistry between Theron and Rogen. The two manage to be both convincing and charming as the main couple in this romantic comedy, and their relationship and how it develops helps really anchor this film. Along with the main two leads, the side performances are also enjoyable, particularly Serkis, Raphael, Bob Odenkirk (possibly playing himself as President of the US), and Ravi Patel as Field's other staffer. I do like there is something of an actual political message in this film, as opposed to just using politics as basically a hook. There is a recurring conflict in the film between Flarsky uncompromising idealism and Field's more pragmatic politicking, and it does play into the romantic comedy plot of the film. Finally, I appreciate that this film had a style and flair to it. A lot of comedies today rely heavily on improvising (a lot of Seth Rogen films, too), and not having a more stylized look or feel to them. I appreciated that there was a style to this. Finally, it's funny. I laughed pretty consistently throughout the film, and I laughed hard at the jokes.

      This follows the beats of a romantic comedy pretty dogmatically. It is really easy to see where the plot is going and how the journeys will lead. This isn't too much of a problem, but maybe a little bit more of a surprise might've helped keep the film more interesting and provocative, which is what they are likely aiming for. The ending was a bit too neat, and simultaneously with not much actual resolution. A bit more of a tie-up with the other characters might've worked.

     I enjoyed this movie. I laughed consistently. That makes it a general recommendation in my book. If you like comedies or political comedies, this is one of the better examples of it, and it uses politics as a sub-message than just a setting for a romantic comedy. That said, it's probably one I won't revisit in the future, so bare in mind that it is mostly just entertainment.