Monday, December 31, 2018

Films of 2018 -Part II(Okay to Best)

So, here's Part II.

------------------------------------------

Okay 

Green Book 

This is yet another one of those films, where a white man is taught by a black man to remedy and change his ways. It does not do anything new with this genre or really comments on modern racism through the lens of the past. It's a feel-good feature for people to be just satisfied that racism was a thing of the past rather than something that is still endemic to the modern day. Still, it was fine for what it was. Viggo Mortensen and Mahershala Ali give good performances, and it never gets really offensive. It had good intentions, certainly, and I can't say that it was bad.

Mary: Queen of Scots

If you saw the trailer, you basically get the gist of this. An retelling of the conflict between the titular character and Queen Elizabeth of England in the 16th Century, it seems to recast Mary and the Kingdom of Scotland as progressive liberal Catholics opposing oppressive reactionary English Protestants, which seems dubious historically( what with who James I, Mary's son, believed). It is a dour historical piece likely meant to showcase Saoirse Ronan and Margot Robbie as actors, and they do well in these roles, but just watch either of their better films if you want to watch it for that specifically.

The Equalizer 2

If I hadn't reviewed this movie, I would've likely forgotten that I had seen it or mostly what it was about, so my prediction in said review was accurate. This was exactly what it was: a brutal action joint with occasional character moments for Denzel Washington, much like the first one was. For what it is, though, it was never dull or bad at any point. It just wasn't terribly memorable or interesting.

Beautiful Boy

This was a fairly frustrating viewing experience. Both Steve Carell and  Timothée Chalamet are quite good, it has a number of well-done scenes, and it shows a very dark and poignant look into meth addiction. However, it never really came together in the end. The film also had some scenes that could've been done better, and sometimes, the dark scenes depicting the descent of the main character also interact with other scenes that are very heavy-handed with almost after-school levels of melodrama about addiction. Still, it's hard to really get mad at this film, given what it's trying to do, and it does give information at the end about meth addiction, so I do think, in spite of its flaws, that it should be viewed.

Operation: Finale

The 1960 capture of Adolf Eichmann (regarded as one of the architects of the Holocaust) in Buenos Aires is good fodder for historical thrillers (and has been mined by authors like Fredrick Forsthye and Ira Levin for fictional ones), and this film attempts to bring that idea to fruition. Unfortunately, aside from the moments depicting the locating and extradition of Ben Kingsley's Eichmann, along with the interactions between Oscar Isaac as the leading Mossad agent and Eichmann, it feels more perfunctory, just telling the historical parts without any real flourish or intrigue, and I admit, it feels a little too sympathetic to Eichmann's claim that he was only a functionary carrying out a superior's orders (historical evidence shows that he was actually very fanatical and very devout to the Nazi cause). It depicts an interesting period of history, so if you are interested, it is worth watching for those who don't know.

Incredibles 2

Another disappointing Pixar sequel in a string of disappointing Pixar sequels, and probably the most disappointing. The original lent itself well to sequels focusing the growth and adaptation of the titular characters and their world. Where the film really shines is when it actually focuses on that, with Mrs. Incredible becoming an active crime-fighter whilst Mr. Incredible stays behind to raise the children, which lent itself to interesting familial drama. Unfortunately, it is bogged down by said Mrs. Incredible plot, where she fights a villain with... television screens to... brainwash people? I can't remember what the villain's motivation or plot actually was. I just remember that I knew the twist when the character the villain turned out to be was introduced, because modern Disney now focuses on twist villains as a crutch to interesting storytelling. I'm not going to say that it wasn't fun, and it is above other Pixar sequels, but I can't say that I'm looking forward to Toy Story 4 next year.

Skyscraper

In the vein of 90's era Die Hard rip-offs, this basically is "Die Hard, with the Rock in a burning building." It has its tense moments, especially with the Rock trying to get back into the building and his family (including wife Neve Campbell) struggling to escape, but this is more or less a generic thriller. Not to say that it wasn't entertaining (in fact, it was very entertaining), but honestly, just watch Die Hard again.

A Futile and Stupid Gesture

Another biopic, where the interesting, dynamic life behind it (that of National Lampoon founder Doug Kinney) is sandpapered down into a standard biopic format, where he faces love, loss, opposition, and ultimately, posthumous recognition. Despite depicting the raunchy, revolutionary humor and personalities behind the Lampoon, this is ultimately safe for a biopic, with only occasional interesting moments satirizing and homaging Lampoon (and at one point, Saturday Night Live) jokes. Still, it wasn't very inaccurate by what I've read, and it was somewhat interesting to watch this dramatization, so I put above others of this sort.

White Boy Rick

Another Scorsese Knock-Off, with more things going for it than other Scorsese Knock-Offs. It is very stylized, Matthew McCounaghey gives a great performance as the father (as per usual), the dude playing the titular character has a lot of charisma (even if his acting is not up to speed), and I do like how it subtly contrasts darks with harsh electronic lights to give an unnerving feeling. Still, it is a SKO (TM), and fails to really escape from the trappings and predictability that implies.

Wreck-It-Ralph 2: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Yet another disappointing Disney sequel. It has the interesting conceit of having Ralph and Penelope leave the rather archaic setting of an Arcade to the more contemporary Internet (with a very creative vision of the internet through electronic character's eyes), and has a good message about how friendships do evolve. Unfortunately, it is also bogged down by product placement (which, fine, a movie like this probably needed that), ideas that never fully gestate, and a plot that runs out of steam towards the middle.

The Happytime Murders

Yes, that infamous scene is in the film. Yes, it is as disgusting as they showed. However, overall, I actually laughed a fair bit. There were a number of good jokes, which weren't overtly reliant on shock value derived from seeing Henson puppets do adult things, and it was somewhat interesting in how it shows a world of humans and puppets (even if a lot of it was cribbed from Who Framed Roger Rabbit). It wasn't great or consistently funny, but it was entertaining for what it could've been.

Solo: A Star Wars Story

Whilst not really groundbreaking and having the problems of being yet another origin story, this was pretty alright, for the all the news of its box office disappointment. Alden Ehrenreich manages to capture the charm and charisma of Harrison Ford, it has that pulpy adventure feel that actually inspired the original Star Wars, and the world-building was impressive (going off The Last Jedi). It was fun, but I can't say I thought about it much since I did see it.

Tag

This was charming. A story of a group of men who have a long continuous game of tag (based on a true story), it shows the camaraderie and friendship these men have, and just how fun and weird it could get. All the actors look like they're having fun, and it was never really dull to watch, though it feels more like a cult classic than really one that is beloved in the present.

Mission Impossible: Fallout

I admit, whenever I have to recall what happens in any of these films, I come up empty. The plots are almost irrelevant, since they are more about the elaborate stunts and set pieces, which are usually very impressive and the highlight. This one did kind of have an interesting plot (though one that follows the last one, which I saw a while ago, and couldn't remember), but it is mostly about the action scenes and the exotic locations. I don't fault any of that, and it is usually very fun to watch, but not one to really stick in the hippocampus.

My Dinner with Herve

I was actually really looking forward to this HBO biopic, given that it was about the titular real-life dwarf actor Herve Villechaize (played by Peter Dinklage) in Hollywood, and his struggles dealing with both his upshot to fame and chronic health problems. What I got was decent enough, with Dinklage giving a very impassioned, layered performance to the character and Jaime Dornan's journalist character (based on director Sasha Gervasi, who interviewed the real Villechaize right before the latter's 1992 suicide) also having his own problems. Sadly, we never really get to see his character outside his struggles to handle fame, with Dinklage and Dornan spending most of the film arguing and the journalist never really appreciating Villechaize until the very end. Also, Villechaize's known charity work with abused children is never really brought up, which could've improved the film (especially if they depict him confronting abusers at crime scenes, which he was known to do).

The Mule

I saw this movie two weeks ago, and I'm already forgetting large chunks of it. Clint Eastwood's attempt to tell the story of an octogenarian drug mule (played by Eastwood himself) feels very meandering, with a number of subplots and characters fighting for attention, and comes off more like a more turgid version of Hell or High Water. I can't quite say it was bad, and it boasts a number of good scenes and Eastwood's superb performance, but it feels more like him just stroking his ego as he enters old age.

Mamma Mia: Here We Go

The first one was what it was: a fun romp-y musical where a bunch of actors are engaging in campy, over-the-top renditions of ABBA songs, and it was decent at doing that, even if it wasn't my thing. This one is basically just like the first one, with a different plot and largely different characters. Again, for what it is, a way for people to have fun and nostagically sing ABBA, it does its job well, and I can't honestly fault it too much for doing that.

Oceans 8

Again, another one where actors basically have fun, this time planning and executing an elaborate heist, with twists and near-reveals all around. The Oceans movies are more about just fun and intrigue, and they are generally enjoyable to watch. This was enjoyable to watch, and a nice little reprieve.

Pacific Rim: Uprising

Without the vision of Guillermo del Toro at the forefront, this becomes more generic in both its look and its action. That said, it still features giant robots fighting giant monsters, with likeable characters and a fairly engaging plot. I do like how the brighter colors do capture the spirit of the tokusatsu shows that this series is homaging, and that it does follow-up on the plot of the original without copying it. Again, though, giant Robots fighting giant monsters. What more can be said.

Papillon

Haven't seen the original, so can't comment on its fidelity to that, nor its fidelity to the alleged true story, but as a stand-alone film, it was fairly entertaining. Both Charlie Hunnam and Rami Malek give good performances as their archetypes, and it gets fairly dark and disturbing when depicting life in this French prison colony, as well as the elaborate escapes that they plan. The epic scope of it reminds me a lot of Lost City of Z, another Charlie Hunnam film.

Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot

In attempting to tell the story of Portland alternative cartoonist John Callahan, director Gus Van Sant fails to really find or say anything about him, his life, his work, being disabled, the nature of alcoholism, or even the healing powers of AA. This really sinks the film, especially since it has that air of importance. However, what saves it is showing this man as a full human being, instead of an inspirationally disabled sort many depict these sorts of stories as. It helps that Joaquin Phoenix is great as Callahan (in spite of not being disabled, though that can be forgiven since Callahan got his disability from a car accident), and the other actors play off him well.

The Front-Runner

In the #metoo era, it was perhaps ill-advised to try to frame the story of Gary Hart and the collapse of his 1988 Presidential campaign as a story of a disastardly press smearing him for imagined sexual improprieties (even if they do have a token bit of opposition). That uncomfortable subtext really hurts this film, and undercuts any message it may have had on the press-politics machine, and even the relatively good parts, like Hugh Jackman's performance as Senator Hart.

Flower

This was definitely flawed, with the dark comedy being sometimes too dark and not very comedic, and the plot is hastily put together, with a vague resolution tying things up. However, it is interesting and engaging most of the , and Zoey Deutch gives a pretty involved performance as the lead. It's higher than the rest mainly because of those two, and the ambiguity it plays up very well.

Hotel Artemis

A more sci-fi riff on a concept like Free Fire, this has interesting visuals, memorable characters, and generally good action.  The more grungy, slightly dystopian future is fully utilized in the plot and the characters, as opposed to just being dressing for a generic assassin plot. However, its fatal flaw was mostly just not being terribly engaging or consistently fun, leaving it more polarized in terms of tone and interest.

Hell Fest

This had an interesting idea of setting a slasher film within a horror themed carnival, and the problems this inevitably causes. It had a number of good, creative kills and scares to go along with this premise. Unfortunately, it feels too long and often has to stretch out the plot really have many of these scares. Honestly, this might've worked better as a short film. Hell, there was an episode of the TV show Psych that had a very similar premise, and it did it better within 40 minutes.


Aquaman

There's some really good stuff in here, like the bright, colorful visuals (which finally puts an end to the DCEU tendency towards having it be hard to see), the very creative realization of Atlantis, the very sordid and engaging plot, the very creative creatures that pop up, the full utilization of Aquaman's powers. There is also some dumb stuff, like the villain (called "Oceanmaster,"), the sometimes absurd lengths that they go, and the more absurd special effects that pop up. Again, this is better than the other DCEU films excluding Wonder Woman, so maybe this franchise is starting to get better with each try.

The Meg

For what is effectively a high budget version of an Asylum creature feature, this was legitimately entertaining. Jason Staithem has fun romping it up, fighting a giant prehistoric shark, the set pieces are well-done, and it does have a very good, intense climax. This was definitely a funner, better done prehistoric monster movie than Jurassic World 2.

Welcome to Marwen

Flawed, yes, especially its vain attempts to capture how Mark Hogencamp's installation was of real therapeutic value and its seemingly simple resolution to his problems with anxiety, as well as the way Hogencamp is portrayed on occasion. That said, it was consistently entertaining and Carell does give a good performance as the lead, and honestly, the uncanny nature of Marwen and its plastic inhabitants was not as jarring as other reviews have said.

Good

Can You Ever Forgive Me?

Melissa McCarthy was quite good, as others have noted, at playing disgraced former celebrity biographer turned celebrity letter forger Lee Israel, showing someone at the end of their rope and how their crimes are led by that desperation. The film does a good job of meticulously deconstructing how the letters were forged and why they fooled so many with their detail. It is a good "true crime" story without much stakes to make it too dark.

The Old Man and the Gun

What may or may not be Robert Redford's last role in a half-a-century long career sees him at his finest, showing off his full range of charm, nostalgia, and genuine fun. Redford really captures the essence of a man who lived by his own code and had little regrets, despite being a bank robber and prison escapee. His excellent performance is enough to elevate an uneven film that varies from standard crime film to period homage with an unstable transitions. So, yeah, go watch this for Redford's performance.

Crazy Rich Asians

Admittedly not exactly my sort of features, this had a lot of charm going for it, with both Constance Wu and breakout star Henry Golding having a ton of chemistry and their relationship having a very heartwarming feel to it. It's a romantic comedy, but a well-done one with likeable characters and a look into the weird world of the titular olde rich in Singapore and the antics they get down to. 

Halloween

Being that I've only seen the first three Halloweens, this reboot very graciously decided to follow only the first one, making it easy to follow for someone like me. Whilst not reaching the cleverness and tension of the first one, this version of Michael Myers is a presence that is very demon-like in his invulnerability and single-minded focus to kill. There is a overt presence of evil surrounding his character, and some of the characters lose their lives failing to grasp this. What really elevates this film was Jamie Lee Curtis as an older, paranoid Laurie Strode, now estranged from her own family and obsessed with finally destroying Michael Myers. Curtis is great in the film, showing how a trauma like the events of the first film can have long-term ramifications for a person, especially at a young age, and how it changes someone. Plus, she's pretty badass in the climax.

Rampage

This was the kind of  movie I would've loved as a kid. A straight forward, unashamed, action-packed monster movie, which features a lot of monsters, a lot of monsters fighting, and a lot of monsters destroying cities. It really brought back memories of watching these sorts of  films on FX or whatever. This was just pure fun, a sheer delight at every minute, with the Rock as an added bonus. This is probably the best video game adaptation made thus far.

Bad Times at the El Royale

Whilst occasionally underexplained and several loose plot threads, this historical thriller is aptly thrilling and uses its setting to great effect, showing the contrast between early Kennedy era glamour and prestige, and the late 60's tumult and disillusionment. Each character is well-defined and fits into a certain part of a larger puzzle, whether at the titular hotel, or within their own past, which all come crashing into this singular location in one glorious sweep. This is sure to be a cult classic within a few years.

Isle of Dogs

Wes Anderson is one of those love-him or hate-him sorts. I generally like his films, which never fail to be charming and fun, and this was very charming and fun. That said, this is lower than I originally put it, mainly because I did mull over the film, and I admit, it is a tad jarring that Wes Anderson (probably the whitest of white filmmakers) decided to make this a specifically Japanese set film with Japanese indicators throughout. I don't think it was offensive or particularly condescending, but there is that element hanging over this film, and that really weakens it in my eyes.

Tully

This is one of those films where the leading twist actually caused a complete 180 in my opinion. I had found the film mediocre right up until a major reveal was made. Then, the parts and the themes suddenly clicked for me. I looked over the rest of the film, and saw the sort of commentary it was truly making. I don't want to ruin it for you, so just see it to know what I mean.

Alpha

The trailers made this out to be a fun, family friendly adventure showing the birth of man's domestication of dogs. This was definitely not family friendly or really fun. It was quite dark, showing the main character being brutalized and scarred by the prehistoric world he inhabits, and very epic, with large sweeping shots and a large scale journey. Similarly, the man-wolf dynamic is more subtle than just alluding to humans and dogs, and works as the main relationship that centers the film. It was far better than I ever expected it.

Deadpool 2

I liked the first Deadpool, but I don't think I liked it as much as others. This was definitely an improvement, showing both superb humor and metacommentary on superhero films and their tropes, and legitimately good action and a good character arc for Wade Wilson. I laughed the hell out of many of the jokes (including a jab at Deadpool and Cable's creator Rob Liefeld), and had a hell of a time, especially when a certain character shows up.

Ready Player One

I think maybe I'm kind to this film, because it was far better than the book it was adapting and definitely fixed a lot of the problems it had. It is still an 80's nostalgia-fest with tons of references and a definite movie for more geek insiders, but Spielberg manages to dig through that, and finds a legitimate throughline he could explore, specifically his own long, varied career, the various people he knew, and his rumination on his own complicated legacy within the film world. While not A-List Spielberg, it definitely is one of his more interesting recent works, and has more weight to it than Ernest Cline's book did (Let's hope the upcoming Armada could get such a talent to make it as good).

Annihilation

This was more a pity placement, given how it was mistreated by the studio and its release botched. Whilst this sort of high minded, cerebral science fiction is my bread-and-butter, and I did enjoy this, I never really got to love it as others have. While superb at all levels, including plot, characters, effects and themes, something about it just prevented me from getting invested fully in it. I can't quite put my finger on it, but something was off about this feature. It just didn't really work as well for me. Maybe I might warm to it on subsequent viewings. I do recommend this very much though, since it is very good.

Ant-Man and Wasp

This was the lesser Marvel film of the year, but I can't say I didn't still have a blast at this. Now having the origin story out of the way, the film is able to focus on its size-changing hero and heroine to its full potential, making full use of their powers both in the action scenes and the plot, which make use of the surreal quantum realm in a very Marvel way. It was just pure fun and joy, after the real downer of Infinity War.

Vice

Adam McKay's comedic bio of the 46th Vice President starts a bit shaky, with Christian Bale attempting to act out of very hideous make-up, and the biopic stuff clashing with McKay's attempts at satire. However, once we get into his vice-presidency, it gets really good, showing the meticulousness of Dick Cheney and how he was able to influence most parts of the Bush presidency, and his role in starting the Iraq War. McKay's talent towards satire and righteous anger finally shines through, making up for the lackluster first half.

Mid90's

Jonah Hill's directorial debut eschews him as a lead in favor of exploring his own nostalgia. In this case, he explores the skateboard subculture in, well, mid-90's Los Angeles. It was more counter-cultural and insular than the way I remember skateboarder culture during my own childhood (which was very corporate and sanitized). Hill manages to capture the raw feeling and energy of this particular scene, and more generally, the ups and downs of being an adolescent and trying to find your identity and the people and things you encounter during that journey. It is the kind of film that should be shown to young teens.

Widows

This seemingly high-concept film about a group of widows trying a bank job after their thief husbands are killed during their last one, manages to tie itself into themes of grief, politics, class, economic inequality, and gender. It is all done superbly and is very interesting and invigorating during its runtime. Unfortunately, after I was finished watching, I didn't find myself really thinking about it later on or really considering it. It just kind of went by, which is partially why it is in the middle of this list as opposed to closer to the top.

Eighth Grade

I graduated middle school only around 8 years ago, so watching this was an interesting window into how it differed from my own experience in this short span of time. Just as one example, social media just starting to become a thing when I was in eighth grade, so it wasn't as pervasive as it was depicted here (social media was larger in high school, from my experience). Aside from rumination, this was another classic coming-of-age story in the making. The kind of film that will find its audience with the current generation of middle schoolers (albeit on home video, since it is rated R for stupid reasons), and has resonance both with them and with older people, especially with its exploration of growing up and how troubling and intimidating it can be.

American Animals

A docudrama exploring a strange real-life story, the directors manage to pump more into what appears to be a standard heist-gone-wrong by also exploring the idea of adapting a real-life story to a narrative. It shows how the story changes depending on the perspective of the person telling out, how the fiction and romance of something almost never translates into how to actually execute it, and the necessity of changing true story to fit into a narrative structure.

Assassination Nation

The only thing that really encapsulates this film is.... YIKES!  This is raw and disturbing in ways that I find hard to really describe. It is definitely an internet film that actually looks at the dark side of it, focusing on the idea on what happens when the personal data we think is safe and secure is suddenly out for everyone to see. The film shows the degradation of a community because of this, with a particular focus on how these sort of attacks disproportionally affect women. Indeed, the vitriol is eventually centered on our four leads. This reminds me most of the classic Twilight Zone episode "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street", where a community is torn apart and destroyed because of their own paranoia. This is very much of that nature and shows that some things really never change.

First Reformed

A religious film that focuses on being a faithful person in a world that is increasingly chaotic and dystopic without devolving into a bullshit persecution complex narrative? Believe you me, in an era of Pureflix, it is very refreshing to see a religious film where questions of faith, community engagement, and especially environmentalism are handled with complex discussion and deep consideration. Ethan Hawke will probably get an Oscar for his performance, and it is well-deserved. I would honestly prefer if the myriad of Christian movies would be more like this than Pureflix.

Disobedience

Another film that focuses on questions of religion, though this time, centering on concealing an LGBT identity and relationship within the very conservative world of Orthodox Judaism. Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams are great as the two lovers, and it was intriguing enough to explore this insular world, and how being different is cause for being repressed and scorned by the community. I won't say much more, mainly because I'm not terribly qualified to comment on this.

Game Night

This was a lot of fun. Turning a simple murder mystery inside out, gradually snowballing into larger and larger stakes for the main characters, there was never a dull moment watching this film. It always found a new way to grab your attention and keep the film fresh and interesting. Helping was the humor and the fairly stylized cinematography, which gave it a more unique, thriller-y look to what could've just been a mildly funny comedy.

Early Man

I grew up with Wallace and Gromit and Shaun the Sheep, so I was pretty hyped for this new Aardman feature, and it does deliver. Showing the origins of Association football, there is a charm and an energy to the film that is rare in modern animation, making use of its likeable characters and odd setting to make some creative jokes and puns. It was a delight, especially since it plays inspiration sports tropes straight, making it a real feel-good feature.

Love, Simon

I'm not really qualified to say whether this is something that will resonate with gay teenagers of today, being a college aged straight guy. I will say that this was one of the more charming and feelgood films of the year. Simon's journey as a closeted gay teen and his struggles finding an also closeted pen-pal had its ups and downs, and it does get a little absurd with some of the characters. However, I really enjoyed watching this, and I also find it heartwarming that people came out during screenings of this.

The House With A Clock in its Walls

Another one that I would've adored as a kid. Eli Roth manages to capture the feeling of an 80's Spielberg film without going hard into it like, say JJ Abrams. Thus, the film is both an homage to Amblin films of the 80's, and a standalone entertaining film, with some very creative uses of magic, and a dynamic duo of Jack Black and Cate Blanchett, who steal the show.

Blackkklansman 

One thing that Spike Lee can never be accused of is never going all out. Taking the real life story of  black Colorado Springs police detective Ron Stallworth and his infiltration of the Ku Klux Klan during the 1970's through voice and impersonation, Lee turns it into a low-key homage of Blaxploitation. It shows the real face of white supremacists as less sinister and more incompetent, with the real obstacle being the institutional police force, who, despite requesting Stallworth to infiltrate a speech by black activist Kwame Ture, is reticent to really deal with the Klan or help Stallworth's investigation.

Avengers: Infinity War

That ending, huh? I won't spoil it, but it was a real gut punch to see such a downer ending. I mean, that was pretty ballsy, and a good penultimate entry within this part of the MCU. That was what solidifed it for me, but after the incredibly disappointing Age of Ultron, this signals more of a return, with all the characters thus far teaming up, working off each other, doing their internal fights, and just trying to tie up loose ends and unfinished scores. What also works about this was Thanos, who is very human in his portrayal, very convinced that, in spite of the atrocity he wants to commit, that he is doing the right thing, and even shows genuine emotion during a key scene. Plus, all the little nods and references here and there. This was probably the best set-up they could have, and hopefully, they follow up on it.

Mary and the Witches' Flower

The debut feature of Studio Ponoc (founded by a former Ghibli producer), this reminded me most of Ghibli's The Cat Returns. It is a straightforward adventure with an adolescent girl sucked into a strange magical world that ... actually, that seems to describe most of Ghibli's products. I think the closer comparison is that, unlike the more heavy and cerebral Ghibli films, The Cat Returns was more straight-forward adventure, which this also pretty much is. It is still very energetic and creative, with gorgeous animation, and I would definitely recommend to Ghibli fans.

Bumblebee

This was ... incredibly good. Unlike the increasingly mean-spirited, almost incomprehensible  Transformers films that preceded it, this manages to avoid everything that would make it unpleasant. The CGI on the robots is cleaner and brighter, meaning I could tell them apart and could see the action clearly. It has likeable, memorable characters, with Haliee Steinfeld in particular giving a great performance in the lead. Most of all, it has a lot of heart, and just a ton of fun. A sheer joy to watch.

Blockers

I didn't really expect that this film would actually be more about parents learning to accept their teenage sexuality from the trailer, which seems to just depict the wacky hijinks they get to in the film. I'm right in the demographic that this is likely to unappeal to (this seems oriented towards high schools and middle aged parents), but I found myself both laughing at the jokes and appreciating the underlying message.

The Hate U Give

Unexpectedly powerful does not begin to describe this film. This YA adaptation focuses on police brutality and its effects on black communities, through the lens of a young Black teenage who goes to a white private school. What appears to be a straight-forward coming-of-age slowly incorporates grief, community, white privilege, and the underlying effects of crime and racism on a community, and it deals with it both with appropriate sternness and occasional humor. Amandla Stenberg, who was everywhere this year, gives a great performance as the person forced to navigate all this. One of the last scenes of  the film is a real gut punch that just invokes so much power. Again, very not qualified to say if this will have resonance among African Americans, but I was very touched by this.

Overlord

If there is one thing I've learned I do truly love, it's full-on no-holds-barred unashamed horror schlock, and this was right up my alley. Starting off as a WW2 film about an elite squad trying to stop a Nazi communication tower in occupied France, it becomes a full-on horror film as it is revealed that the communication tower is hiding a massive complex where horrific experiments are being held. The two films go very seamless into each other, and there is never a feeling of jarring tonal shift. Hell, the experiments are played up the same way real-life atrocities are in serious war pictures, with surprising respect and diligence. It was fun without going into camp or parody.

A Star is Born

Having never seen any version of this, I wasn't quite sure what to expect. Again, unexpectedly powerful is inadequate to describe just how impactful this film was. Beyond the romance plot between Lady Gaga's and Bradley Cooper's character is a fairly dark look into the effects of fame and jealousy, where one rise of fame leads into a fall of fame. This gets very bleak with where it goes and how it handles its characters. Bradley Cooper is able to show musical performances as if one were actually there, while still making it a little stylized. Cooper also brings out the best in the performers, not with Lady Gaga, but also Sam Eliot, Dave Chappelle, and even Andrew Dice Clay, of all people.

Searching

This was very tense and shocking, a kind of high-wire thriller that just throws twists at you at every opportunity. I was in awe as to where this film went, and just how the lengths it actually went. What also works was picking up all the small details. All the little stuff around that help give subtle hints both to the central mystery and to just the world around it. This might require several viewings to get all the little references made. All this, using the gambit of a computer screen film to great effect, focusing on the use of the internet in solving disappearances and how a computer screens captures more of life than we tend to think. This helped me get over my aversion to that particular style cemented by Unfriended.

First Man

I'm something of an Apollo nut. I'm not a full on expert as of now, but I know a fair deal about the program and its history, so this was good to watch on that level, as it seems to recreate many of the events well (including the Apollo 1 incident). However, the main focus is on Ryan Gosling as Neil Armstrong, and his struggles, with training as an astronaut, being selected as the first man on the moon, dealing with the loss of his fellow Astronauts, and especially his relationship with his wife Janet. There is more of a quiet awe and energy to the film, more solemn in its portrayal of Apollo 11 and Armstrong than purely celebratory, but the Moon landing (very meticulously recreated) is shown as the culmination of the past 9 years. It gets emotional and dark at times, but ultimately celebrates the man and the achievement that will secure his name in human history for millenium to come.

Upgrade

This was this years' underrated delight. What starts off as effectively a superhero film with a character who has advanced abilities from an AI installed into him to help with injuries from a car accident gradually becomes more demented in its action and cerebral in its themes, as each character is slowly revealed to be not as they appear, and the situation itself might be more than meets the eye. With this rather intelligent outlooks comes brutal action is both fun and a little sickening to watch. It was the kind of pure energy that more independent films need, and is one of Blumhouse's finest.

Blindspotting

One of the ending scenes of this film is probably the best individual scene of the year. If you see the film, you know what I'm talking about. The trailers made this feature out to be a look into police brutality and the relationship between the black protagonist (Daveed Diggs) and his white childhood friend (Rafael Casal). It is both, but there is a large subplot about gentrification that ties into both of these as well, with the character slowly finding their neighborhood unrecognizable amid these new changes. All help to give an atmosphere to the Oakland neighborhood described and a growing trepidation about these changes in the backdrop of watching these two friends (one a convicted felon) deal with this world.

Hereditary 

The degradation of the American family has been a theme in American gothic horror since the days of Edgar Allan Poe. This film takes it in an interesting direction, adding a supernatural twist a la The Shining. However, if there is one film that is it most similar to, it is actually the original Suspiria This was honestly a better Suspiria remake than the actual Suspiria remake. It capture the spirit of it, shares its use of bright colors in junctions of scenes of intensity, and is just weird and insane in fun ways, whilst being its own unique product. The latter is key: in spite of taking a well-worn idea, it manages to infuse a very distinct story and look to the film to make it stand out. It was truly nervewracking to watch, especially with that hell of a climax.

A Quiet Place

While Hereditary was probably the better horror movie, this was simply the better film in general due to its innovation. This is a film that mostly conveys actions without much sound or audible dialogue. Much of it is conveyed through sign language and body language. This helps with making you jumpy whenever a sound comes out, since it is an indication that something terrible is going to happen. That's really the main conceit of the film: making the very idea of sound terrifying. Helping this is John Krasinski's and Emily Blunt's performances, both show the anguish and paranoia they have to endure to protect their families in this climate, especially an infant who is unaware of the dangers that it poses.

The Death of Stalin

The Soviet Union has been a bit of pet interest of mine for a while, so this new film exploring the aftermath of the death of Joseph Stalin and the resulting politicking and scheming was of course of interest to me. Many of the figures were recognizable from my reading of history, including Nikita Khrushchev, Lavrentiy Beria, Georgy Malekov,  Vyacheslav Molotov, Marshal Zhukov, and   Anastas Mikoyan. Far from being a dry historical take, however, this was an hilarious, darkly comic romp that takes aim at the absurdity and cruelty of the Stalinist system, and how the fall of its dear leader lead to a scenario of infighting reminiscent of the very bourgeois system the USSR replaced. Despite being a comedy within a horrific period like the Stalinist one, it never mocks the victims or trivalizes the bureaucratic  system  that lead to it. If anything, the humor highlights just how surreally cruel that period was.

If Beale Street Could Talk

Director Barry Jenkins decides to forgo the harsh colors and moody tone of Moonlight, into a more nostalgic, sentimental tone for this film, an adaptation of the James Baldwin novel of the same name. Whilst there are some very bright and romantic scenes in this, it only serves to show how bleak other scenes are, especially when it comes to the prison system and the effects it has on a person. It is a dark film to be sure, where the conclusion is probably going to be harsh, but one that Jenkins infuses with a little optimism. Just enough to show that not all is lost.

Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

The best Spider-Man film ever made. Yes, you heard me correctly. An homage to the entire history of the beloved wall-crawler, its focus more on Miles Morales as he both deals with the responsibility of being the new Spider-Man (and gaining the curse of having his personal life devolve into a complete nightmare) and multiverse antics with a variety of other Spider-beings helps make it distinct from the other films. The two plots are seamless and go together very well, and both help serve Miles' story. Each of the Spider-Beings are unique, fun, interesting, and dynamic in their own ways. Also helping is the unique comic book look to the film that has tons of tiny references and tiny little jokes packed into each corner. The action is so fast-paced and colorful, it is like reading a Spider-Man comic. I loved this film, and I think it is one that I will see in the future.

Sorry to Bother You

It took me a bit to really appreciate this film fully. Granted, I liked the film when I first saw it, and knew just what he was satirizing (i.e. the relationship between capitalism and racism and their varying intersections), but it felt a bit flabby at parts and the somewhat uneven. However, after doing some research into this and its filmmaker Boots Riley and his own political philosophy, my appreciation for this film just jumped. It is astounding that they trojan horsed an explicitly socialist film into American cinemas, especially one that took direct aim at the capitalist order and its dehumanization. Once it all clicked for me, I became a massive advocate for this film. It is a truly radical experiment, a kind of provocative film that'll be talked about and dissected for years, and which modern events will be compared to for generation. So, I must say to Mr. Boots Riley: Bravo.

Best Film of 2018

Black Panther

There really wasn't going to be a competition here. When I saw this film back in February, I knew this would top this list. Not just because it really was a cultural event in a way that many films aren't these days, or that so many people were able to appreciate and love the film or that people have been adopting it to empower further generations. All of that was contributing factor, but at the end of the day, it was just a damn great movie. A perfect amalgamation of action, commentary, Afro-futurism, drama, politics, superheroes. It was truly a great film, one that proved very resonant with most people who saw it. Each of the individual parts of the film are done in such a superb way, from the costuming to the acting to the effects to the story, and this was made with such passion and vision that it's hard to surpass, even among the other Marvel films this year. I really hope this wins Best Picture, because it really deserves it.


---------------------

So, yeah, those are my lists. Some time in the next week, I will post a full version. For now,  hopefully 2019 isn't our last year. In the meantime, I will continue to do my various series of reviews and commentary, with January bringing a review of the 2012 forgotten blockbuster Battleship. Happy New Year, everyone.



Sunday, December 30, 2018

Films of 2018 (Part I- Worst to Meh)

   So, it's that time again. At the very end of the year, I look at every film I saw this year, and rank them from the very worst to the very best. The Films of 2018 (with a name change upon realizing that these weren't really "top" films if all of them are placed on this list). Just a reminder, this is every film I saw during the year that was released in some capacity to a wide audience in the United States (since that was the only way I could've seen it). If it came out in 2017 to select audiences, but had a wide release this year, it counts. If a film isn't on this list, I simply didn't see it, easy as that. Although, I doubt it, because by my count, I saw 103 films this year (hence, why I might release this before my usual New Years release date). Part of that was the late MoviePass, which afforded me the opportunity to see a lot of films in its short time as the hot thing before its collapse, and it just kept on going. Will this number be the new norm for the next few years? No clue. After noting that number to my sister recently, she suggested splitting it into two parts to keep it shorter. This is a great suggestion, and why there are two parts now. For those who want the full spectrum, I will put the two lists together after both are posted. Also why I forgoed the posters (honestly,  I never liked doing that) So, without further ado,
Worst of the Year: 

Red Sparrow

I don't really have a strict criteria for what ends up in worst place. It's more of a gut feeling, really. I just kind of know or realize something is the worst just ruminating on a film or even right after watching it. For this year, it really was no contest, because I wanted to walk out of this film. The only reason I didn't was that I saw it with my dad (a decision I regret). This was the one I hated the most, because it was the most offensive. The film chastises the audience for indulging in sexualizing Jennifer Lawrence's Russian spy lead (a tool brutally used by the SVR in a exploitative manner), then very hypocritically indulges in such exploitation to such a degree that it outbalances any defense it has that it is "commenting" on sexual exploitation in spy films. This was legitimately uncomfortable to watch, and not for the reasons the filmmakers likely intended. I felt angry watching this, with the level of hypocrisy that it indulges in. Along with that unforgivable aspect, the film is also incredibly confusing and boring, with an ending that literally defies explanation.  Once I finally got  out of this slog, there was no question that it was likely going to be the very worst of the year, and here we are.

Bad: 

Peppermint

I considered tying this with Red Sparrow, because I also felt like walking out of this. What ultimately kept it off was the fact that I saw this alone, and saw the whole damn thing, so I could've walked out, but didn't (should've, though). This is very much this year's American Assassin, where it is drenched in reactionary politics in a distinctly Trumpian mold with its overt focus on Mexican drug cartels and villainizing them specifically, along with endowing them with influence within our legal system that is likely unearned. This was offensive, especially in this climate, as well as (to keep with the American Assassin comparison) incredibly dull and confusing. 

The Cloverfield Paradox 

The previous two films were ones I wanted to leave, but decided against. This film has a leg up (or down rather) on them, because I actually never finished watching this. Not because I was offended (this is so milquetoast and generic that I can't imagine anyone getting offended by this), but just lack of interest. Really, it wasn't even that bad from what I saw, but that the fact I a.) decided that life was too short and postponed finishing it, and b.) went ten months without finishing kind of warrants a spot here. 

Billionaire Boy's Club

Leaving Kevin Spacey aside, this was yet another lazy retread of  "started from the bottom, now the top, back to the bottom" bit of vacuous so-called "commentary" on American capitalism. I really can't think of anything else to say about this, that I didn't already do in my previous evisceration of this. It was just another one of these films, and the only reason it will be notable is the fact that it is Kevin Spacey's last coherent performance and the fact that he lead to the film's haphazard release, making it one of the biggest flops of the year. 

Gotti

The film with a well-deserved 0% on Rotten Tomatoes.  One that takes what should be the straight-forward story of Gambino crime family head John Gotti, and obfuscating it through confusing narration, underexplained characters and motivations, and John Travolta's frankly bizarre, almost parody version of Gotti. This was so bad, it was kind of mesmerizing. It felt like one of those really bad Coleman Francis movies on Mystery Science Theater 3000, the kind of utter failure that makes it a bit compelling. I kind of want to see one of those "oral histories" done on this, to see just how they screwed up what should've been something that was as direct as the life of John Gotti. 

The Nutcracker and the Four Realms

Well, now we get into the area of "movies that aren't offensive or ill-conceived or incompetent," this was technically better than the last four entries, but frankly, I got angry watching this. It just feels so corporate, so cynically made, conceived more by a marketing department using focus testing than by any sort of vision or passion. There was a literal Disney film with commercials in it that felt less of a product than this. It is yet another "gritty reboot", with a twist villain, an attempt to make sense of a fantasy realm meant to be abstract, and a very cynical attempt to make it as broad and tentpole as possible. I legitimately felt mad at the sheer gall of this film to play cliches completely straight. Easily the worst of live-action Disney.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom

A lot of defenses for this film center on how they didn't mind the various deficiencies in  plot and characterization, because it was "fun to watch". That's good to hear, but to follow this assumption, I have to actually think this movie was fun to watch, and not incredibly boring and absurd. I was not invested at all, and the other problems of the film just sprung out even harder. If you want to make a fun, dumb movie, make a fun, dumb movie, not a dull one with pretensions towards social commentary.  Like I said in my review, this is easily the worst Jurassic Park by a long shot. I can't imagine it getting worst, but who knows? Maybe the next one will have Chris Pratt literally get eaten by a T.Rex, only to cut his way out of his stomach. 

Robin Hood

This really didn't know what it wanted to be. A more historically accurate take on the tale? A commentary on modern events using the story? A fun romp with absurd action? They decided to put them all together, and the result is as haphazard as you can imagine. This is the kind of film where an elaborate Prince of Persia-esque action set piece is followed by a very brutal depiction of war crimes. If they had stuck to one, it might've worked better, but this was also just boring and the action too unnecessarily CGI'd for it to have any real impact. 

Life of the Party

I don't know why I watched this. Melissa McCarthy comedies have never appealed to me, and somehow, it sunk below my already low expectations. With no real plot, McCarthy largely just wanders around, improvising, mostly making incredibly unfunny jokes. Like with Jurassic World 2's action pieces, the ineptness of the humor means that the plot, in all its meandering, contrived manner, is ever more egregious. Maybe in its defense, the audience seemed to enjoy it, so good for them, I suppose, but this was agonizing to get through. 

Boundaries

This was bizarrely bad. Again, no real plot, with characters who are either deeply unlikable or just creepy in their behavior, and no real sense of urgency or sympathy. Worst, just sitting here, I really can't remember anything about this. I just remember just how weird and tedious this was. Given I have another 94 films to do, I don't think more needs to be said. 

Chappaquiddick 

What could be an interesting examination of wealth, privilege, politics, and scandal, and the intersection of all four within the Chappaquiddick incident in 1968, instead devolves into TV movie melodrama. This looks very cheap and shot generically. The acting is pretty subpar, with even Bruce Dern giving a largely inert performance as Joe Kennedy, Sr. Again, aside from that, I can't really remember anything about this, it was just bad in a generic sense. 

I Feel Pretty

This had the rare moment for comedy for me, since the audience was almost completely silent. Maybe a chuckle once or twice, but overall I didn't hear a sound coming out of the other patrons. This was painfully unfunny, with the already dubious premise of serious brain damage as a device to push the plot (this is becoming a thing for some reason), and, despite its body positivity message, engages in very hypocritical fat jokes. I got maybe some chuckles from this, so this was technically better than Life of the Party, but not by much. 

The Spy Who Dumped Me

Okay, I'm going to repeat myself with this. It wasn't funny, the jokes were stale and obvious. It is yet another spy comedy, in a genre that has been oversaturated since the 60's. It's action was both unengaging and surprisingly dark for a wacky comedy like this. Its twist is fairly obvious, and its plot was fairly predictable. Again, what I could give this over the other comedies was that Mila Kunis and Kate McKinnon have good chemistry, so that was mildly entertaining, though even they get tiresome after a bit. 

Suspiria

Director  Luca Guadagnino said that this was not a remake as much as his own interpretation of the original. Apparently, his interpretation involved taking everything that worked about the original (the use of colors, the scares, the sense of mystery and intrigue), and making instead a dull, obvious historical drama, where its themes are confused or underexplored or just dropped at the end. I wasn't asking for a shot-for-shot remake (which would've been bad and unnecessary in its own right), but even taking the original out, this was just tedious and pretentious, and overlong. Seriously, this was over 2 and a half hours, and it felt even longer. There was an after credits scene apparently, but I wasn't going to stick around to see it. 

Kin

You know, this was built up for me as a "so-bad-it's-good" feature, and it's not. Aside from truly bizarre scenes (like one where James Franco urinates in a gas station. Yes, really), it really just is kind of a generic attempt at melding a sci-fi high concept with a family drama with a road trip movie. The characters are irrational, and the plot really only works because the characters act in utterly bizarre and illogical ways. It was bad, but not in a particularly interesting or fun way. It was just kind of boring. 

Beirut

I keep forgetting that a.) this movie exists, and b.) I saw it. Once I get there, I vaguely remember the plot. There was an ex-diplomat, and he is brought in before the 1982 Invasion of Lebanon to negotiate with a PLO insurgent who he had raised. Something about the latter's brother held in an Israeli prison. Actually, I remembered a lot more of this than I thought. The biggest thing about this film was that I can't remember much about this. This was just a generic period thriller with nothing really distinguishable. Its worst crime is wasting Jon Hamm and Rosamund Pike (who I just remembered was also in here). 

You Were Never Really Here

This is probably going to be the "controversial" choice on this list, given that it has an 86% on Rotten Tomatoes.  Frankly though, I hated this feature. Like the Suspiria remake, it takes a fairly interesting premise, and basically nullifies its potential by making as drab and pedestrian as possible. I had a hard time following what was happening, and a hard time caring. One film critic I saw praised the sound editing. I have no clue how, given that a scene revealing a key piece of information had dialogue sounds equivalent to listening to Charlie Brown's parents. Again, I didn't care about anything that happens in this, and the normally superb Joaquin Phoenix is left without much to do. 

Where Hands Touch

Anyone remember that episode of American Dad where Roger was a Bond-style supervillain, with a plot to create a pure Oscar Bait film to cause people to literally die of sadness? This felt like a real life incarnation of Oscar Gold. A film focusing on the Black Rhinelanders (basically, the children of French African soldiers and German women following the First World War and the French occupation of the Rhineland) during Nazi Germany, it feels very Oscar Bait-y, with the way that it heavy-handedly deals with racism, Nazism, and history. That in and of itself wouldn't be so bad (I don't necessarily think that Oscar Bait has to be bad), but its main problem is that it feels too generic and Hollywood in its treatment of this subject manner. It feels more like a Weinstein sort of calculated attempt at awards recognition, without trying to deal with the heavy historical subject in a meaningful or impactful way. The story of the Rhineland children and their struggles during the Nazi era really deserved much better than this.

Bohemian Rhapsody

The interesting, dynamic presence of Freddie Mercury and his sordid life is sadly condensed into a simple standard "music biopic" format by director Bryan Singer and screenwriter Anthony McCarten (notable for other standard biopics like Theory of Everything and Darkest Hour). Rami Malek delivers a great performance, but is saddled with a script that leaves him with little to do aside from the standard stuff one might find in a music biopic, and with some changes that feel egregious knowing the real story. It's a shame that Freddie Mercury and Queen, who were known for their genre bending, innovative music, are reduced to following cliches. Oh, yeah, and they don't play a Queen song in full until the Live Aid reenactment at the very end. So, they didn't even get that part right. 

Life Itself

Dan Fogelman made the program This is Us, which was decent enough from my admittedly limited viewing. Unfortunately, he attempted to make lightning strike twice with this  a film that is misguided in its ambition and scope. Its attempts at making a branch of narratives that ultimately intersect fall apart due to painful dialogue (which is only mitigated thanks to actors like Mandy Patinkin and Antonio Banderas), poor characterization, and very confused attempts at themes. This is a film where the concept that things are unexpected is the same thing as an unreliable narrator. Ambition is a good thing, but sometimes, you end up with a Project Vanguard. 

Meh

Anna and the Apocalypse 

Yet another ambitious project that unfortunately fails to live up to its promise. The idea of a "zombie-Christmas-musical" is fairly interesting in its own right, but the film squanders this by having inert, mostly forgettable songs, a jarring tone where brutal scenes of zombies interact with elaborate musical numbers in a way that feels entirely incongruous, and a mostly generic zombie apocalypse plot (which I would've forgiven had the former two not also been problems). It's a real shame, because the actors seem to be having fun and it does feel like there was passion behind this project, so I can't be too mad at it, but not enough to really like it.

The Oath

The sheer absurdity of the Trump era has become a source for comedy for the past three years. Some of it great, some of it good, some of it bad. This is in the latter category. Obvious jokes with obvious archetypes stating what they would obviously say. Even during the main thrust of the plot, this problem sort of infests the rest of the film. Still, some occasionally interesting and funny moments (including a twist for one of the antagonists) keeps this from being completely irredeemable.

The Wife

I guessed the twist of this from the trailer. I'm not sure if this was intended or not, given that there is general hints of it early on. Aside from decent performances from Glenn Close and Jonathan Pryce, this felt like a sort of prestige film that would appeal to white, upper-class film snobs, but has little utility beyond that. Not to say that it is only liked by that group, but it's not exactly the kind of film that will be remembered beyond a year from now. 

Collette

I was very mad at this film when I first saw it. I'm not sure why now, it really didn't deserve the kind of ire I had towards it. Sure, it's a generic historical drama which sandpapers its interesting subject into a palatable format for the aforementioned film snobs to celebrate their own liberalism, but it is competent, Keira Knightley gives a good performance as the titular author, and it has very good intentions in showing the life of an innovative novelist and lesbian in the early 20th Century. Can't say that I liked it, but I could see why others might. 

Venom

I felt bad watching this, because whenever something stupid happened (and that was frequent), I would just burst out into laughter, and I felt bad for disrupting the other patrons. Despite getting tons of unintentional enjoyment from this, I feel its badness has been overblown a little by critics. Yeah, it's funny sometimes (especially the bromance between the Venom symbiote and Tom Hardy), but it's largely boring and its fight scenes and CGI incomprehensible. Honestly, it's just kind of bad the same way other bad blockbusters tend to be. Still, I would rather watch this than any of the DCEU trio of suckage, so there's that. 

Thoroughbreds

Another possibly controversial one. I've softened a little on this, and I might be more inclined towards it, if I watched it again, but as is, I felt this to be subpar. Largely feeling more like an imitation of one of those 90's high school dark comedies, this fails to really make us care about its leads or their goals or really, gives any sort of insight into the world that these two girls inhabit and how it affects their outlook. 

Overboard

What puts this above the other three comedies is that I laughed a decent number of times, so I technically liked it more. Well, "laughed" is a strong term. I chuckled a couple times. Having not seen the original, this was not good per se, but it's not terrible, at least as far as comedies go.

Gringo

This is frustrating, because I did laugh a few times and it had some very good jokes, but I found everything around it to be awful. The characters are so unlikable, and the story is so haphazard, that I find it hard to relate invest myself in. However, I am ashamed to admit, I did laugh, and laughed hard, a fair number of times, so I suppose that it wasn't entirely without merit. Honestly, I wouldn't recommend seeing it though. 

A Simple Favor

After seeing two of his other features (Bridesmaids and Spy), I can confidently say Paul Feig movies aren't my thing (a real shame, because I love Freaks and Geeks). The main reasons I find at least in his comedies is his overreliance on improvisation and his largely stale filmmaking. The main problem with this is largely the latter. Because this is a more serious drama, Feig's blank, generic directing makes it seem more like a Lifetime movie or some cheap TV Gone Girl knock-off. It really doesn't much help to convey what should be a shocking film. Still, the performances of Anna Kendrick and Blake Lively, and the legitimate funny moments, are enough that I did have some enjoyment from watching this. 

The Grinch 

It bothered me throughout the year that this was not called How the Grinch Stole Christmas. It's an iconic story with a title that conveys exactly what it's about; why simplify it. Anyway, the once famously cantankerous Grinch is, in this version, slightly spiteful and mostly just sardonic then malicious, until he decides to steal Christmas, for reasons too banal to really describe. Ultimately, though, it wasn't nearly bad enough to be offensive, and the look really captured Dr.Seuss' vision. However, just read the book or watch the Chuck Jones version if you need to quinch your Grinch hunger. 

Juliet, Naked

Another one I had to struggle to remember what it was about. I'm not terribly familiar with the oeuvre of author Nick Hornsby, so maybe the particular themes of this work might resonate with his fans more. Honestly, this was just kind of pedestrian and not very distinguishable from other pseudo-indie features of its nature. The only real thing of note was the three leads, with Ethan Hawke stealing the show as what I think is supposed to be a "Jeff Buckley if he lived" sort. 

 A Wrinkle in Time

This year's "What the Hell" entry. I didn't like this, but I have to admit: it was interesting in its badness. Its weird, expansive visuals failed to relate to a confused, seemingly heavily edited down story. I had to watch to see where this was going. For a film that was ultimately bad, I was interested in what was going to happen, and it was never dull. It really is the sort of thing that will become a cult classic down the line. 

------------------------------------------------------

That's it for Part I. Please join us for part two coming up in the next few days.





  


Wednesday, December 26, 2018

2018 Documentary Feature

       So, with the relative success of the last one and my stringent rule against comparing documentaries and narrative films (except when the documentary is so fictional as to warrant such a comparison), I'll just do this once again. This is more a list of all documentaries I saw the past year, regardless of when it came out or where I saw it. It will be listed in terms of how much I recommend it. So, without further delay:

Won't You Be My Neighbor (2018)

This year's most- hyped up documentary, with good reason. Focusing on the life of Fred McFeely Rogers, host of PBS's Mr. Roger's Neighborhood, the documentary avoids a straight-forward hagiography and simple timeline in favor of a full exploration of Mr. Rogers and how innovative his approach with teaching children really was. His patience, kindness, and understanding was what made him so endearing to both children and adults. Refusing to deify him and focusing on his weaknesses and insecurities as well as his strengths, ultimately, the film shows how we, in spite of our imperfections, all could follow his example. His message of understanding the inherent value in being a person is sorely needed at a time like this.

Wild, Wild Country (2018)

From the best in humanity, we go to some of the worse. I had passing familiarity with the story of the Rajneesh cult and its conflict in Oregon, so seeing a full, detailed look into it was illuminating. What began as what appears to be another run-of-the-mill guru led cult is hijacked into a plot to seize complete control of a city through voting and land ownership, and the attempts by the locals to stop it. It is truly shocking the lengths Rajneesh cult (and, in particular, the Rajneesh's assistant Ma Anand Sheela) went to secure this goal are astounding, and need to be seen to be believed. Especially enlightening was the interviews with the remaining followers, who try to justify or deny everything that happened, in spite of its escalation

An Open Secret (2014)

Another example in the worst in humanity, this film is an exploration of paedophilia within high ranking circles in Hollywood, told by the victims and their friends and family. It shows just how disgusting individuals within these sorts of stratified institutions are protected by their connections. Whilst parts of the doc are a tad vague and underexplained (likely owing to legal issues), enough is said to be really outrageous. With the ongoing revelations of metoo and growing awareness of sexual assault in Hollywood, this is perhaps more timely than ever.

In Search of Steve Ditko (2007)

Onto lighter topics, this is an old favorite of mine that I had seen before. I will list docs I've seen before this year, (unless they were noted on a previous list) and I wanted to highlight this one in particular with the passing of Steve Ditko this year. Host Jonathan Ross explores Ditko's life and career, seeing how his crude, brutal artwork made Spider-Man such an enduring character to this day, and showing his expansive creativity when making other characters, such as Dr. Strange, his political avatar Mr.A, or the various characters he created for Charlton Comics and DC, all with his distinctly Objectivist political edge. All the while, Ross interviews a variety of comics fans, scholars, and writers, including Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, and Mark Millar, as well as Ditko associates like John Romita, Sr., his former editor Cat Yronwode, and estranged Spider-Man co-creator the late Stan Lee. Finally, Ross and Gaiman track the reclusive Ditko to his New York studio, where they meet off-camera. I can think of no better intro to comics than this, which shows the work of the medium's  finest artist.

She Makes Comics (2014)

Except maybe this. Focusing exclusively on various women that have worked in all parts of the comics industry (whether mainstream, alternative, independent, the comic strips), interviewing personalities like Marie Severin, Trinia Robbins, Wendy Pini, and G. Willow Wilson, this explores an underappreciated part of comics history, showing the triumphs and struggles many of these women went through both in mainstream and underground comics, and the staggering impact many of them had on the medium. It is simply a great documentary.

Bill Nye: Science Guy (2017)

Another doc on a PBS star, though one where he's living and can discuss his life. Again, one that focuses both on Nye's strengths as a science communicator and his battle with pseudoscience, and his own personal struggles, particular with his family, and the prevading sense of failure as pseudoscience continues to exist even as he battles it. It is far more than I expected, and will show a side of Bill Nye that many don't often get to see.

The Perfect Bid (2018)

Growing up, whenever I didn't go to school, I would grab a bowl of cereal and watch the game show The Price is Right. I wasn't (nor am now) good at it, but it still holds a place of nostalgia for me. This particular doc focuses on a contestant named Ted Slauson, who extensively studied the show, trying to categorize and memorize each prize for each items through a variety of means (namely early computers), and attended many of the showings, making accurate predictions. Whilst his own tenure on the show was only brief, he became something of a fixture on the stage for a period of time. However, what seems to be a story about a particular obsessive gradually reveals a larger scandal a few years later, when Ted is accused of aiding another contestant with specific enough prices. Whilst parts of the doc don't work (anything with Bob Barker is off-putting, given the various scandals attached to him and Drew Carey was only interviewed once or twice), it is fairly captivating for showing this.

Three Identical Strangers (2018)

The other huge theatrically released doc of the year, what begins as a recounting of a strange historical curiosity (triplets adopted by separate families reunited) gradually revealing a more sinister and conspiratorial agenda, and the underlying nature of humanity. To say more would give away the very insightful and disturbing nature of the piece and its implications.

Ray Harryhausen: Special Effects Titan (2011)

Another favorite of mine, introducing me to the pioneering stop-motion work of Ray Harryhausen. Showing the insight of the man himself before his death, as well as his various admirers (including such luminaries as Steven Spielberg, Tim Burton, and James Cameron), it chronicles his career and the various kinds of movies that he worked on, from monster B-Movies to mythological epics. It tells the story of a true auteur, someone who, despite not directing a film, definitely left a mark and a distinct filmography.

The Cuba Libre Story (2016)

A straight forward historical documentary, focusing on the sordid, revolutionary, and tumultuous history of the island of Cuba, told from the perspective of various historians and participants. Whilst starting a bit slow, as the historical perspectives moves on and the stories get more personal, it picks up, showing both the high and low points of Cuban history and its sometimes world altering nature.

Jack Kirby: Storyteller (2005)

Stan Lee's other disillusioned collaborator, this doc has less of a personal focus than the Ditko one, but provides a good overview of Kirby's work, and his impact on the medium, with his various admirers on display. It's a good intro if you want to get into his works, and as a Kirby fan, I do recommend watching it.

Nintendo Quest (2015)

The story of one man's quest to collect all 678 licensed games for the Nintendo Entertainment System within 30 months without the internet. Following the surprisingly intricate process of collecting and trading. It is surprisingly tense watching the lead haggle and negotiate to gain high-quality copies and try to mark off the list as soon as possible, showing the world of classic video game collecting in the process, amid recent concerns that older video games are slowly becoming unplayable due to age. This was just fun to watch, and a nice look into Nintendo fandom.

Generation Wealth (2018)

Again, this is more of a general recommendations list, and this is the one that I recommend the least. Not that it was particularly bad or incompetent, but it had the least impact on me. I came out of this with little actual insight into wealth or its impact or a real understanding of it. It feels more like a slideshow of various wealthy people and how they spend their wealth. I'm not saying that it should be judgmental, but a little bit of commentary would've been nice.

--------------------------------------------

So, that's my docs for this year. Stay tuned for my year end list, coming up in the next few days.


Sunday, November 18, 2018

Dailles and Nightlies- 2010: The Year We Make Contact

   2001: A Space Odyssey is my all-time favorite film. I've said this on this site multiple times, and will probably bring it up whenever it feels appropriate. I see the film at least once every year, I've read the book, I've read the sequel books, and I've read everything I could on the production of this film and its novel. So, it was a pretty good year for me when it became its 50th anniversary. With the attention given to the film due to this, I decided, with the inauguration of this new series, to spotlight its lesser known sequel. Arthur C. Clarke (co-writer of the original film, and the author of the book) wrote 2010:Odyssey Two specifically as a sequel to the film's continuity (i.e. changing Saturn in the book to Jupiter in the film). Stanley Kubrick declined directing, so Peter Hyams (known for Capricorn One and Outland) took over those duties, (having to start over with effects due to Kubrick destroying the original props), and was released to mixed critical and financial success in 1984. So, yeah, in honor of its 50th anniversary, we take a look at its underappreciated sequel.

     In 2010, 9 years after the Discovery shut down in Jupiter's orbit, Heywood Floyd (Roy Scheider, taking over the role William Sylvester played in the first one) took the fall for the events, and is mostly working in the Very Large Array. He is approached by Dimitri Moiseyevitch (Dana Elcar), a representative of the Soviet space program (remember, this was made in 1984), who hopes to recruit him for a Jupiter mission they're planning with their ship  Alexei Leonov (named for the first human to conduct a spacewalk). They hope to investigate the events that lead to the shutdown of the Discovery , the malfunction of its computer HAL-9000 (Douglas Rain), and the disappearance of Dave Bowman (Keir Dullea). Most significantly, they hope to examine the large monolith the Discovery was sent to investigate (as revealed in the climax of the first film). Despite rising tensions between the US and USSR under a conservative president (who cut funding to Floyd's agency while they were planning their own Discovery Two to investigate) and an incident in Central America, Floyd agrees, and manages to get approval for him, Walter Curnow (John Lithgow), the designer of the Discovery and Dr. Chandra (Bob Balaban), HAL's creator, to travel with the Leonov. They find themselves with already tense relations with the crew, including Captain Tanya Kirbuk (Helen Mirren), who is concurrently a major with the Soviet Air Force; Dr. Vladimir Rudenko (Saveliy Kramarov), the ship's doctor; and Irina Yakunina( Natasha Schneider), the ship's nutritionist. As they enter Jupiter orbit, they find strange signals coming from Jupiter's moon Europa. After prodding from Floyd, they investigate further, only for a strange light to emerge. This only harkens the strange events that may or may not explain what happened to the Discovery, Dave Bowman, and HAL-9000.

      This could've easily just been a Kubrick knock-off, a way to just imitate his style without any sort of consideration as to why that style is effective or making it work in its own way. While there are a couple Kubrick style shots and homages in the film (including an amusing one where he and Arthur C. Clarke are the US President and Soviet Premier on a Time magazine cover), Hyams largely does his own style, making it very distinct from the original and not overly reliant on it. I do like the more modern, 80's feel to the film, which, while unable to top the timeless period-ness of the original, is an interesting enough in its own right. The effects are superb, especially considering that they had to largely remake a lot of them from the originals. It keeps up with the original in those terms. It largely keeps to the events of the book (though my favorite scene in the book, where Dave Bowman is shown the floating gasbags of Jupiter, and oceanic creatures of Europa by the monolith beings, isn't in the film).

     Which probably leads me to my first problem with the film (and the book): the ending, where it is revealed the monolith beings want to create a new sun using the monoliths to create enough mass. It makes sense, given what has been stated in the plot and gives a good climax. However, it stretches belief and feels a bit odd in an otherwise realistic film. Another book-related problem was the explanation of HAL's malfunction. It is revealed that he was torn between the original mission orders and orders given to keep the Monolith secret. It feels like a disappointment given the scale of his malfunction, and felt like something else was missing from this, but the film decides to just leave it there.

      This is definitely not as good as the original, but most films in general aren't. However, I do think it is a good sequel in spite of that, and just a good standalone film, and does improve on the book by adding the Cold War tension to it. If you like the original, you'll like this, or appreciate it. Even if you don't like it, this is distinct enough from it that you might enjoy it. Definitely see 2001 first, though, if you haven't already. It is a far better film, for sure. However, this is a nice underappreciated film, and especially a study of Cold War tensions in film.   

Sunday, November 11, 2018

Current Film Review- Bohemian Rhapsody

        The main criteria for whether I review a film or not is "Is there enough for me to say on it?" and "Is there an interesting spin to it?" There are films I strongly like or dislike, but don't really write a review, because I can't really find anything to really say about the film in detail, or say something that hasn't already been said before. In the case of this film, it has gotten notoriety ... actually for most of its production history. With the conflicts between original actor Sasha Baron Cohen and the surviving members of Queen, to the further conflicts caused by the notorious instability and unreliability of director Bryan Singer, it was not really an easy transition to the screen. Not helped by the fact that early versions of the script downplayed Freddie Mercury's bisexuality and AIDS diagnosis (I'll get into that later.) With this extremely troubled production, it really is something of a surprise that this is as banal and unremarkable as it is.

       The film follows the life of Queen frontman Freddie Mercury (Rami Malek), from his origins as  Zanzibar-born Parsi immigrant Farrokh Bulsara joining a band named Smile with guitarist Brian May (Gwilym Lee) and drummer Roger Taylor (Ben Hardy) in Imperial College (later joined by bassist John Deacon ( Joseph Mazzello), to their rise under the new name Queen, to the seminal album A Night at the Opera (or rather, just "Bohemian Rhapsody"), eventually ending at their iconic performance at Live Aid in 1985. All the while, Mercury deals with various relationships, both romantic, including Mary Austin (Lucy Boynton), Paul Prenter (Allen Leech), and Jim Hutton (Aaron McCusker), and professional, with the other band members dealing with his more ostentatious, volatile nature.

       The hype is true: Rami Malek is absolutely fantastic in this role. He manages to get the accent down, he gets the stage presence so perfectly, it's a tad unnerving, and manages to imbue his performance with both loud rocker style and the quiet, nervous presence Mercury was reported to have in private. The physical resemblance also helps. If there is one reason to see this film, it's for his performance alone, especially during the Live Aid segment. That segment is also probably the best scene in the film, a near perfect recreation of the event, where we actually get to focus on Malek's performance as a musician and Queen playing music ....

      Which brings me to my first problem: there isn't really a full Queen song until the end. They play some of their iconic songs, sure, but not in full or they're background music. You'd think they'd focus on the various innovative, memorable songs that are still played and remembered today, but the film basically rushes through them, going from one to the other without really exploring them or having the decency to play the whole song! Even the titular song (while its production is explored in full) isn't played in its entirety. Seriously, in a Queen biopic, you'd think they'd play more Queen in it. The point about how they rush through their discography is really emblematic of the film's central problem. It is so standard and by-the-numbers that one can predict how it'll go even with the bare bones synopsis I provided. Filmmakers ought to be screened Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story before they make music biopics, because they haven't really learned to go beyond the tropes and plot structure that film satirized very acutely. This film is very Walk Hard in how its plot is structured and how it portrays its lead figure. It doesn't help that the other band members are cyphers that just don't have personalities and largely exist to just react to Mercury's antics. John Deacon especially, who barely gets anything to do. (This might be because Brian May and Roger Taylor are producers, so the filmmakers might not have wanted to offend them). The script for this is really overcompensating for the controversy centering around it, to the point of changing the sequence of events to fit it all in. I understand the controversy around straight-washing his bisexuality (and, to the film's credit, it does explore his complicated sexuality, but since the characters aside from him aren't fleshed out, it still doesn't fully work), but, since his AIDS diagnosis came years after Live Aid and they were always planning on ending its there, it does make sense that they wouldn't really cover it except for an after epilogue text(unless they were planning on ignoring it entirely, which is pretty bad). Minor spoiler, but the film moves his diagnosis to before Live Aid, and portrays his performance as some last testament. Also, the band broke up years before and Mercury gravels to them to reunite and Live Aid is their big comeback (something that never happened, and Queen had toured regularly in the years prior.). I understand that liberties need to be taken in order to make an entertaining story, but this level of revision seems only to exist as to get another cliche "musician is too difficult, band breaks up, band makes up" moment that feels like a scene straight out of Walk Hard, and again, feels like it's overcompensating for not dealing with it in the original drafts.

    I'm a huge Queen fan, so this being as boring and cliched as it is is disappointing, given how versatile and ecletic Queen was and the massive influence they've had on music. Even if you just want to hear Queen songs, they don't play a full one until the end, and the film is two hours! Just stay home and play those songs online. Still, Rami Malek's performance is good enough that I kind of recommend it if you're interested in seeing that. However, the rest of the film is just mediocre and really doesn't deserve his performance or the great Live Aid scene towards the end.

Sunday, October 28, 2018

Masterpiece of Horror Theatre- Suspiria

      In my review of Dawn of the Dead, I mentioned Dario Argento, who had helped facilitate the creation of that film. Originally a film critic, Argento got his start in the Italian film industry when none other than Sergio Leone recruited him and fellow critic turned eventual director Bernardo Bertolucci to write the story to Once Upon a Time in the West. From there, he entered the giallo genre of Italian horror pioneered by directors like Mario Bava with The Bird with Crystal Plumage, starting off a prolific and influential career (many American slashers would take influence from the giallo genre from films like Bava's and Argento's). The particular idea for this film came from English writer Thomas de Quincey's 1845 collection of essays, Suspiria de Profundis, which included Levana and Our Ladies of Sorrow, an essay exploring the idea that there are three Sorrows (Tears, Sighs, and Darkness), much as there are three Fates. Argento took further influence from occult and witchcraft (notably the ideas of Rudolf Steiner) to construct the idea of Three "Mothers" that would embody these sorrows, and would write a trilogy exploring each, with Suspiria being about the Mother of Sighs. Argento's girlfriend Daria Nicolodi further helped with the development (eventually getting a co-screenwriter credit), both infusing influence from fairy tales like Snow White and her own personal stories (including her grandmother's experience at a music academy, and a dream which influenced the ending), which would create the setting of the film as a ballet academy in Germany. Argento originally intended for the film to star girls as young as 12 (to fit in with the fairy tale influences), but his father Salvatore, who produced the film, refused, feeling the violence, gory nature of the film would cause trouble with such young actresses. After the ages were increased, Daria was meant to play the lead, but again, the producers felt an American actress would help promote the film better. Thus, Jessica Harper was cast, based on her performance in Brian de Palma's Phantom of the Paradise. German and Italian actors rounded out the rest of the cast, including Udo Kier. Shot in De Paoli Studio in Rome, as well as additional shooting in Munich, most of the cast spoke in whatever their native language was, which was dubbed over in English or whatever language. Released in 1977, it would garner success critically and financially, both in the US and Italy. Argento would further explore the "Three Mothers" concept in two other films (Inferno and The Mother of Tears), which, with Suspiria, form the aptly named "Three Mothers" trilogy. And, of course, there is the remake coming up in a few weeks at the time of writing.

       Suzy Bannion (Jessica Harper) comes to Freiburg to attend the prestigious Tanz Dance Academy. Unfortunately for her, she has to deal with a downpour, especially when she is briefly turned away from the Academy's door. She catches a glimpse of a girl (Eva Axen), however, as she flees. The girl, Patricia Hingle, runs through the woods, and finds herself at the home of her friend Sara (  Stefania Casini), where she appears to be paranoid about something. Sure enough, she is attacked, and killed in a spectacular, violent manner. This starts off a chain of events, which sees Suzy descend into the strangeness of the Academy itself...

       The one thing that immediately stood out for me in this film was the colors. This has very distinct lighting that bathes the characters in every scene in a strange aura, which precludes the events as they happen. The way that Argento uses Reds and Blues especially helps give the film both a distinct look, and helps with the atmosphere. It is just gorgeous to look at, and shows the images in a sheer, unfettered manner. In some ways, it contrasts the first film I did this month, Night of the Living Dead, which utilized black-and-white to its fullest potential. This emphasizes color films, and uses colors and shadows to create tension.  The style of this film helps with enticing the viewer and pulling them in, along with helping set the mood for the story. You noted the short synopsis, and I really don't want to give anything away. This is the kind of film that needs to be seen. It cannot be conveyed properly through words. Not only with the visuals, but with the story itself. It needs to be viewed with as little context as possible to get the full extent of it. I'm serious, I don't want to spoil any of it. It needs to be seen to be believed.

     The dubbing felt off. It gets distracting sometimes when the speaker is clearly ADR-ed in. It destroys the emersion that the silent moments so very carefully craft. I never felt that the characters weren't actually speaking to each other, but it always took me out of the film when a character's voice didn't match. There were also some confusing aspects to the film, particularly towards the beginning and end, that felt like more explanation or more time was needed to fully detail this.

      A couple days ago, I saw a Wired article that said something to the effect of "Don't watch the original Suspiria  before the remake." Of course, I disregarded this, given I've already replaced one of the planned films. Still, having not yet seen the remake, go watch this. Whether or not you are a horror fan, this is simply an excellently crafted, beautifully shot, and very shocking film that really stuns you in a very good way. This is an overall recommendation.

    So, that's it for this year. I hope you enjoyed this and the new Summer edition. I'm glad I'm back to choosing a diverse range of films to do, after doing more concentrated work for last year and the Summer of Terror. I really do enjoy watching these, and writing about these, and with the new Summer, I hope to watch more of the popular franchises that have come along over the years. Anyways, thanks for following all this month, and I don't know if I'll start November like this, but I'm planning on doing a "Dailles and Nightlies" on 2010, the sequel to 2001.   

Saturday, October 27, 2018

Masterpiece of Horror Theatre- American Psycho

       Bret Eaton Ellis' American Psycho was released in 1991, towards the end of the 80's culturally in the US (with the collapse of the USSR and the election of Bill Clinton on the horizon). Having explored the culture of dissatisfied teens in Less than Zero and The Rules of Attraction, American Psycho explored the "yuppie" subculture of wealthy young people on Wall Street, through the lens of Patrick Bateman, secretly a psychotic murderer, and would explore the excesses of consumerism and capitalism. The book was ... controversial after its publication, with some taking issue with Bateman's misogyny and the violence. The controversy didn't deter Hollywood, with producer Edward R. Pressman buying the rights with Johnny Depp in mind for the lead in 1992. After Stuart Gordon fell through, David Cronenberg was attached to direct, with a script by Ellis himself.  Eventually, this fell apart due Ellis' dissatisfaction with where Cronenberg wanted to take the film. The film went around, at one point being considered for a TV series for NBC, before eventually ending up with another Canadian director Mary Harron (known for her film on Valerie Solarias, I Shot Andy Warhol (if you wanted to know who she was)), working from a script she wrote with frequent collaborator Guinevere Turner. Controversy still followed the film, due to the book's reputation and especially due to the Columbine massacre. Many tried to stop the film's production through various means, and many fashion labels and some artists (including Whitney Houston) refused to have their products shown. Christian Bale (ironically the stepson of famed feminist Gloria Steinem, a staunch critic of the book and the production, who would later urge Leonardo DiCaprio when he was attached to back out) was given the lead, with Willem Defoe, Reese Witherspoon, and Jared Leto in supporting roles. Emerging Canadian film company Lionsgate would purchase the film, though pushing for Edward Norton or Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead. Harron briefly left when Lionsgate replaced Bale with DiCaprio, and Oliver Stone replaced her. However, when this fell apart both Harron and Bale returned. Bale primarily channeled Tom Cruise in the role (ironically, given Cruise was a minor character in the book), and studied the book extensively to prepare for the role.  Released in Sundance to polarized reactions, it would receive positive reviews and good box office. Ellis was decided ... mixed on the film, let's just say.

      In 1987, Patrick Bateman (Christian Bale) lives a very meticulous life as a Wall Street investment banker. He has an extensive morning routine to keep his face fresh, he has what we in our modern era might call a playlist of 80's pop to listen to, and he dines with his fiancee Evelyn (Reese Witherspoon) and their vapid friends, including Paul Allen (Jared Leto, and yes, that name is a bit of an odd choice). This all hides his nature as a sociopath and murderer. When Allen displays a better business card than his, Bateman takes out his rage by killing a homeless man (the late Reg E. Cathey) and his dog. Bateman then lures Allen to his apartment, where he lectures Allen on Huey Lewis and the News, before axe-murdering him. This sends Bateman on a spiral, as he is interviewed by police detective Donald Kimball (Willem Defoe)

       I think that this film walks a very fine line. Its various observations, in any other hands, would've seemed too preachy or obvious, and might've come off too comedic to be truly satirical (if that makes any sense). However, director Harron manages to make it obvious, but natural enough that the viewer can believe what the characters are saying, and also glean the messages at hand. How Bateman's feels alienated by a world as meaningless and cold as 1980's Wall Street, and that just fuels his own rage. Christian Bale is a true standout, giving, I think, a better performance than even his turn as Batman in Christopher Nolan's trilogy. He captures both Bateman's yuppie outer self talking to his peers, and him as a depraved individual indulging in his murderous delusions, as well as his mental decline.  I read that Ellis' biggest complaint was that the unreliable narrator aspect of the book wasn't conveyed properly. I disagree. If anything, the unreliable narrator was the best part, keeping the viewer in the dark as to whether Bateman is just imaging the increasingly out there moments that happen to him. The contrast between the very ornate places Bateman inhabits and the very gory violence he inflicts cements the film's themes.

    I felt that some parts were left unresolved or unexplained. Like the character of Kimball sort of disappears at the end, and Allen is implied to be still alive. Or the fact that Bateman is mistaken for various other people. Maybe these are better explained in the book, but they feel like they don't go anywhere or really fit within the film.

      I had wanted to read the book before doing this review, since I had seen the film before, and had hoped to get a new perspective on it. Life got in the way of that, however. That said, this is a true modern classic of the genre, a satirical piece that takes on the culture of the Reagan era and all its truly emotionless, money-driven culture, and holds specific relevance today, if you catch my meaning. A definite watch for fans and non-fans alike.

Tomorrow, I close out this year, in honor of its remake, with Dario Argento's Suspiria.